Making Monroe

Marilyn Monroe’s star has scarcely diminished in the 40-odd years since her death. Is this thanks to her beauty, or the fact she had affairs with a couple of the Kennedy brothers? No doubt her roles played some part, and the circumstances surrounding her death at just 36 a rather larger one. For me though, the single most important thing in fixing MM into public awareness both back then and now is the artist Andy Warhol: it’s his Green Marilyn (1962) we’re looking at today.

Last week, August 5th marked the anniversary of Marilyn’s death: naked and face down, she was found at her home on Fifth Helena Drive. “The long troubled star clutched a telephone in one hand. An empty bottle of sleeping pills was nearby,” reported the Associated Press that morning. For 48 years this death, and the events that later came to light (reports of a visit by her lover Bobby Kennedy; of an ambulance that took her away breathing and brought her back dead), has remained one of Hollywood’s most enduring and tantalizing mysteries.

Which is why Warhol is still doing her such a service: in the face of the scandal and slur of her demise shine his bright, confident pictures that fix her permanently on a pedestal, at her best. Born in Pittsburgh to immigrant Ruthenian parents, Andrew Warhola (1928 – 1987) was a sickly child. As a young boy he’d pass the time in the company of film star magazines, planting the seed for his fascination with all things celebrity. He started out as a commercial artist, but by 1960 was recognized as a leader of New York Pop Art phenomenon, along with Wesselmann and Lichtenstein. The latter said “we wanted to paint pictures so outrageous and ugly that no one would want to buy them, so we used commercial art to send it up, but instead they became high fashion, and our mockery was taken dead seriously and we all settled comfortably into repetition.”

From the banal (repeated rows of Coke bottles) to the macabre (car crashes) Warhol covered it all in the distinctive language of modern advertising. His glamorous portraits of Hollywood stars were also rendered in garish colors and with simplified imagery. He made Marilyn many, many times: her cocktail of glamour and tragedy made her a perfect muse. The work at the NGA is based on a famous publicity still and relies in part on the radical technique that Warhol brought to the traditional genre of portraiture. Called serigraphy, or silk-screen printing, it’s a stencil-like method by which paint is brushed over a screen (of fine silk) so that the color penetrates those parts of the screen that have not been masked. Successive masks can be added to the screen and colors can be combined. Originally developed for commercial purposes (since it’s possible to use unskilled labor to make the prints) Warhol used serigraphy to reel off rapid production of almost identical images.

Much is made of the way in which Warhol turned his art into a successful enterprise with the use of mechanical printing processes: he’d even deliberately remove all traces of his involvement by employing assistants to make up his works. So does it matter that nothing was unique or that he hadn’t actually made stuff himself? Not in the least it seems: “Everyone should be famous for fifteen minutes” is what he said, and as this work shows, both he and she have lasted immortal a lot longer than that.

2 Responses to “Making Monroe”

  • E. Miller:

    I found this very interesting. It made me think about how the people who go looking for fame seem almost less likely to find it then those who let fame come to them. This seems to be the case with Warhol and his pop art contemporaries. The Lichtenstein quote especially caught my eye, “we wanted to paint pictures so outrageous and ugly…” Its amazing how the world changes with time in the way it views artwork.

  • Aleid:

    Thanks E… I also find it fascinating that the “15 minutes of fame” idea began with Warhol…

Leave a Reply

Subscribe & Share
@HeadforArt
Art 2010 Archives
Recent Comments
  • Rebecca commented on Farmyard Fare 
  • Marianne, Do you mean an original or a print? If it is an original you should go to a major auction house such as Christie's, Sotheby's or Bonham's all in...
  • DanTheMan commented on Laugh Out Loud 
  • A friend of mine has this painting just over the toilet in the bathroom - having a little fun with the male visitors...
  • W.gallagher commented on Laugh Out Loud 
  • Many specialists believe that this painting by Murillo is not innocent at all, and depicts a prostitute e and her procuress . Check out the wikipedia article on the artist....
  • Tammi Vaughan commented on Set to Soar 
  • Fantastic images! I love the theme, story telling, highlights and his use of light and dark values.
  • bella commented on Painting the Town 
  • best!
  • luna commented on Nodding Off 
  • Why do you think did the painter take so much care in painting the keys? why did he make the page in the book illegible?
  • marney kennedy commented on Street Scrapping 
  • Dear Aleid, Coincidence of coincidence, while doing a little research on Max Weber for a tour tomorrow I clicked on your site. When the commentary started with "The husband and...
  • Matt Malone commented on Opposites Attract 
  • Nice interviews and video. I like how you tied everything together at the end and explained some of the themes.
  • marianne commented on Farmyard Fare 
  • I have a framed painting of Edward Hicks, the one shown at the top of you website. I would love to sell it. I do not know how to find...
  • Annie commented on Pink Frosting 
  • Great article. Great punchline. Love the two images at the end. I think I will need to celebrate National Hummingbird Day from now on. :D
    HfA Around Town
    Also find Head for Art - Art 2010 at these DC sites:

    TBD Community Network Member - All Over Washington

    DCist