Pleasure Principle

Paul Bloom’s recent book How Pleasure Works (The New Science of Why We Like What We Like) will surely be piquing people’s interest. Blooms says “I’m not a happiness guy – there’s nothing new that I can tell you about how to live a fulfilling life. Instead, I am interested in the more concrete topic of pleasure.” Bloom breaks down the difference thus: happiness is a prolonged state of being that can come from a selection of sources (a relationship, religion, even your genetic write-up). Pleasure, by contrast, is an automatic/ instinctive response that has a shorter running time (from 30 seconds to an hour or two).

Some of Bloom’s bliss-bringers offer surprisingly simple ways to slip some to-savor moments into a day. From playing a song you love over and over, to seeing something that takes your breath away; giving is a good one (if we act generously, we feel joyful), as is grinning (there’s something called “facial feedback” that means that if you smile, you fool your brain into thinking you’re happy).

The perusing of pleasure turned me towards this Cape Cod Evening (1939) by Edward Hopper (1882 – 1967). It’s this sort of atmospheric portrayal of an East Coast scene that has made Hopper the best-known realist of the 20th century. He trained and worked first as a commercial illustrator but broke through the barrier into the art-world in the 1920s when the Museum of Modern Art bought his House by the Railroad. With that in the bag, he started started on art for serious, spinning out an eery, introspective style that became the Hopper hallmark.

Cape Cod Evening begins with the artist’s desire to make (in his words) “the most exact transcription possible of my most intimate impressions of nature.” The grass he glimpsed through his studio windows and he had it that the figures here were worked up without the use of models: “In the woman I attempted to get the broad, strong-jawed face and blonde hair of a Finnish type of which there are many on the Cape. The man is a dark-haired Yankee.”

But this is more than a simple, faithful transcription of nature: it’s a scene charged with strong (albeit ambiguous) emotional current. The composition is straightforward, and opens up a lot of space, which Hopper translates into physical separation between the couple and the collie. This extends to a lack of communication: the woman looks off, the man looks down and the dog has heard some evening sound.

There’s also a desolate quality to the light: it’s an odd sunlight/ twilight brightness that throws those trees into full-on, film-noir style shadows. Though the glare of the house and the glow of the grass focus us on the figures foremost, there’s an effect of encroachment and threat in the ringing darkness beyond.

Hopper sees things with an iced, impassive eye that adds to his look of alienation. There’s a fug of futility here that comes from the cutting out of all the plush and pleasure: no rapport between the man and woman (at least in this instant); no move to pet that beautiful pooch (physical contact with animals works wonders); the stunning setting goes unseen. So it is that from a title full of the promise of ease and please (Cap Cod Evening) streams a scene shadowed by introspection and fearful footlessness. Yes: happiness can be elusive for all at times, and I think Hopper is hinting this here. But he’s also stopped-off those simple sources of pleasure that can be tapped into every day.

Leave a Reply

Subscribe & Share
@HeadforArt
Art 2010 Archives
Recent Comments
  • bella commented on Painting the Town 
  • best!
  • luna commented on Nodding Off 
  • Why do you think did the painter take so much care in painting the keys? why did he make the page in the book illegible?
  • marney kennedy commented on Street Scrapping 
  • Dear Aleid, Coincidence of coincidence, while doing a little research on Max Weber for a tour tomorrow I clicked on your site. When the commentary started with "The husband and...
  • Matt Malone commented on Opposites Attract 
  • Nice interviews and video. I like how you tied everything together at the end and explained some of the themes.
  • marianne commented on Farmyard Fare 
  • I have a framed painting of Edward Hicks, the one shown at the top of you website. I would love to sell it. I do not know how to find...
  • Annie commented on Pink Frosting 
  • Great article. Great punchline. Love the two images at the end. I think I will need to celebrate National Hummingbird Day from now on. :D
  • Joe commented on Birthday Embargo 
  • My brother and I are going through some similar and difficult times in our life. He recollected these paintings as a child when he was on a field trip in...
  • Abbie commented on Closing the Circle 
  • What a wonderful end to such a fantastic year! How fun to see you and hear you speak. You have such a wonderful way with words and I have appreciated...
  • Natasha commented on Closing the Circle 
  • Aleid, congratulations on finishing up Art 2010 blog! This is an amazing achievement - I admire your perseverance. I keep expecting new links to your blog pop up on Facebook...
  • Art-Lover commented on Rocked It 
  • Great description of the artworks of El Greco! I might add that his unique, personal style of painting came from (apart from his own genius, of course) 2 main factors:...
    HfA Around Town
    Also find Head for Art - Art 2010 at these DC sites:

    TBD Community Network Member - All Over Washington

    DCist