Delivering a Message

The Netherlandish painter Jan van Eyck (c. 1390 – 1441) was one of the best and most important artists of the Northern Renaissance, and his Annunciation at the National Gallery of Art leaves no question in the mind as to why. It shows the moment of the annunciation (from the Latin annuntiare, to announce) as described in the Bible in the Gospel of Luke: the angel Gabriel delivers a message to Mary that she’ll conceive a son, the Son of God.

Today is the Feast of the Annunciation, commemorating Christ’s miraculous incarnation nine months before the Nativity at Christmas. The annunciation was a central topic in Christian art during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, physicalizing this most ungraspable of events. Van Eyck’s version (1434 – 36) was probably once the left wing of a triptych (a three-paneled piece). The picture spells out in golden script the words spoken at the meeting: Gabriel’s greeting (“Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with you”) provokes Mary’s response of humble faith (“I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be done to me according to your word”).

But it’s more than words that are written here: van Eyck’s skills are clearly legible on the canvas. He was an artist of rigorous observation, a “what you see is what you paint” kind of guy. He was especially sensitive to the fall of light, so that his physical forms (even that of the archangel) become laden with weight and invested with volume. See the shading that renders the faces round and the way he describes folds of cloth, delineating precisely where Mary’s mantle and Gabriel’s cape turn away from the light.

The facial features are also remarkable. Van Eyck was a gifted portraitist, with a nit-picking eye that he brings to bear here. I adore Gabriel’s rounded, apple-red cheeks and the way Mary’s tucked-in (dimpled?) chin ripples her neck. The fact these faces are 3/4 view (rather than profile) gives us a chance to read the expressions. This lends human freshness to a scene like this, since we can relate to Gabriel’s joy burst and Mary’s consternation.

In the 16th century the artist-biographer Vasari suggested that van Eyck had invented oil painting (mixing pigments with oil as opposed to egg yolk). This is now discredited, but van Eyck did perfect the technique of glazing (building up layers of transparent paint). It is this technique that helped him create the deep, rich colors seen here, as well as the super minute details. It’s astounding, how van Eyck could distinguish between textures from hard, polished stone to papery petals. See the bespoke, bejeweled cape and the brushy, brocaded pillow. Which figure do you think is having a bad hair day? It’s all quite eye-boggling: no artist before (and very few since) had mimicked reality so very well.

The details aren’t there just for the sake of it either. The small white dove channeling towards Mary on gilded rays stands for the Holy Spirit. The white lily near the foreground is an emblem of purity. Even the church can be seen symbolically, with the dark upper story standing for the Old Testament, and ground floor (illuminated by three Trinity-referencing windows) the New. It gets better: the floor tiles show David beheading Goliath and Samson destroying the Philistine temple, two Old Testament events in the salvation of the Jewish people that prefigure the salvation of humankind through the coming of Christ.

Whether you believe in the annunciation or not – I’m willing to bet you’ll find something to marvel at in van Eyck’s painting at the NGA.

6 Responses to “Delivering a Message”

  • Bernie Schneider:

    Aleid, do you know where the church included in the painting is located? It looks very much like a very old church located in Bruges although I suspect that there are many others which have the same features and windows.

    • It’s certainly possible that van Eyck picked up features from churches he knew in and around Bruges (he died there in 1441, a few years after this picture was painted). Here, the round-arched windows of the upper story are typical of the Romanesque period (c. 800s – 1100s) while the (slightly) pointed arches of the lower zone are Gothic in style (c. 1100s – 1500s). The dual architectural styles serve a symbolic function here: the Romanesque features suggest a Jewish setting, which gives way to a Christian (Gothic) one. It’s van Eyck’s way of getting the setting to do the talking, telling us about the passage from Old to New.

  • Maz:

    I love depictions of the Annunciation in art: it’s such a common theme that one can really look at the sensibilities, customs and notions of wealth in the artist’s working environment, as well as the evolution of art and technique itself. I always find the very diverse ways the wings are represented entertaining – i wonder whether the coloring of the wings along the color spectrum from red to blue is significant in this case?

  • Paul:

    I was wondering about her hand gestures. Her left hand is almost, but not quite, in the same gesture as Botticelli’s “Portrait of a Youth” which you wrote about earlier. There is a similarity in the fingers, or am I wrong? Perhaps there isn’t a connection, but I have a feeling that there is.

    • You’re certainly right about similarities between the hands. While I’m not sure about any explicit meaning in this case, there are definite links in the look of the hands. You see, Botticelli had a graceful and ornamental linear style that harked back to the Gothic period and artists like van Eyck. Botticelli would also on occasion ignore elements of anatomical realism, in the service of a pretty picture. So it’s spot-on to point out the links between both sets of elongated, elegant fingers.

  • rutger:

    Flower Power
    Aleid, you did it again, what a great video ! Lovely flowery dress as well !! Spring is in the air and winter has beaten a retreat, finally. Your blog is a daily highlight and an XL-highlight on Fridays. You make each work of art very accessible and contemporary too. The blog is an oasis of reflection and I learn about Georgia O’Keeffe as well. Many thanks and only nine months and a few days to go.
    Absolutely wonderful.

Leave a Reply

Subscribe & Share

Enter your email address:

 RSS Feed

 Art 2010 Podcast

@HeadforArt
Art 2010 Archives
Recent Comments
  • DB commented on First Dance 
  • Great post Aleid! Steen looks like he would have enjoyed a bit of Jai Ho too!
  • Aleid commented on First Dance 
  • That's from the beautiful bride BB, people!
  • BB commented on First Dance 
  • Wonderful blog - keep up the inspiring analogies on all this beautiful Art. That leaves me with just one more thing to add...Jai Ho Baby, Jai Ho!
  • Sarah commented on Secret Supper 
  • From their poses I can assume that they are each lost in their own thoughts, yet still holding a conversation. The man appears nonchalant with his hand on his hip...
  • Aleid commented on Paws for Thought 
  • Go Ensworth AP Art History and Mr. L! Wish I could sit in on a class with you all!
  • Aleid commented on Taking the Plunge 
  • Absolutely. And artists often think extremely carefully about where they place a certain colour in relation to another: intuitive or learned colour-wheel work plays a huge part!
  • Aleid commented on Paws for Thought 
  • Hi Gaye... have just read a plot synopsis for "La Chatte" - sounds so eery! What is it with cats? Thanks for a cool book recommendation!
  • Gaye commented on Paws for Thought 
  • Have you read Colette's "La Chatte"? The CCTV story made me remember that chilling tale.
  • Anna Claire W. commented on Taking the Plunge 
  • I definitely agree with that! I think that colors have certain emotions that are linked to them, but some have multiple emotions. For example, red can seem angry or romantic,...
  • Ben Carnes commented on Bedroom Composition 
  • I added aspects of my room to the art work. So things like golf clubs, a guitar, trophies, favorite books, video games, posters, etc... Anything that described me at the...